SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 273

S.K.SEN, S.R.MISRA
V. R. MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.Swaroop, V.K.Gupta

S. K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence dated the 26th October, 1993 passed by the Court of Learned Sessions Judge, Andaman and Nicobar Islands in Sessions Case No. 9 of 1992 under Section 333 of Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE material facts involved in this appeal inter alia are that the appellant gave a fist/blow on the face of one Shri Chinnappan, an employee of the Port Blair Municipal Board whose duty was to release water in the Village Shadipur where the appellant used to reside at that time. It is the contention of the appellant that there was scarcity of water in the area and the appellant insisted that the said Chinnappan should not put off the switch. The prosecution case is that duty of the petitioner, Chinnapan is to release the water by opening the valve and thereafter close the same. The Appellant insisted that the water should not be stopped since there was scarcity of water. Since the said Chinnappan was duty bound to stop the release of water by closing the switch/valve, the said Chinnappan had to do so and accused appellant gave a fist/blow on the face


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top