SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 374

N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
SUKLA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK CHOUDHARY, C.C.Mukherji, DILIP SENGUPTA

N. K. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept with the record. In spite of service none appears for O. P. No. 2. By this revisional application the accused petitioner has challenged order dated 30. 7. 94 passed in G. R. Case No. 1381 of 1993, by the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th court in a case u/s. 120b/498a/420/406 of the I. P. C. Smt. Indrani Mukherjee, O. P. No. 2 herein filed a petition of complaint before the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate wherein he directed the police to investigate the case in exercise of his pomer u/s. 156 (3) of the Cr. P. C. and upon that complaint the Bowbazar P. S. Case No. 160 dated 13. 5. 93 u/s. 120b, 498a, 420 and 406 was initiated and on the basis of that P. S. Case, G. R. Case No. 1381/93 was started before the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th court, Calcutta. In that G. R. Case the present petitioner made an application for personal exemption from appearance u/s. 205 of the Cr. P. C. The Ld. Magistrate dismissed that application on the ground, inter alia, that section 205 of the Cr. P. C. is not applicable in a case which is instituted on police report. That is not the interpretation of sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top