SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 368

N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
SEEMA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALAKANANDA BOSE, ASOKE KUMAR, RAMENDRA NATH CHAKRAVORTI, SUBHANKAR SEN

N. K. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE accused petitioner has challenged the proceeding in G. R. Case No. 664 of 1993 arising out of Bhatar Police Station Case No. 42 of 1993 dated 18th May, 1993 under section 21 (2) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The said G. R. Case is pending before the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Burdwan.

( 2 ) THE short background of the case is that the Block Land and Land Reforms Officer, Bhatar, lodged a complaint with the Bhatar Police Station as the Authority under the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973 alleging, inter alia, that the accused petitioner has unauthorisedly excavated the land amounting to 55. 582 Cft. of ordinary clay for manufacturing brick without any authorised licence from the government and as such she has contravened section 21 (2) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, Bhatar Police Station registered the complaint treating it as an F. I. R. being Bhatar P. S. Case No. 42 of 1993 dated 18th May, 1993 and on the strength of the same G. R. Case as aforesaid was start





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top