SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 72

A.K.SENGUPTA, SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN
INDIAN OXYGEN LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOITRA, Sunil Mukherji

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal to this court : reference Application No. 487/ (Cal) of 1087 : (At the instance of the assessee) :"1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that reimbursement of medical expenses paid to the director employees in cash and hospitalisation expenses came within the purview of the expression 'remuneration, benefit or amenity' under Section 40 (c) of the Income-tax Act"

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that reimbursement of medical expenses paid in cash to its employees was 'salary' for the purpose of Section 40a (5) of the Income-tax Act ?

( 3 ) WHETHER the Tribunal was right in holding that expenses incurred on publication of the chairman's speech in newspapers and journals came within the ambit of Section 37 (3a) of the Income-tax Act?

( 4 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the cost of calendars and gifts distributed by it was includible in working out the disallowance under Section 37 (3a































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top