SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 11

TARUN CHATTERJEE
SARAT CHANDRA DAS – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.PATRA

TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.

( 1 ) T. Chatterjee, J.-Can an adopted son be considered to be a "son" within the meaning of "family" as defined in section 14-K (c) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 (for short "act") is the question that needs to be decided in this writ application.

( 2 ) A proceeding under section 14 (T) of the Act was started 'by the Revenue Officer, Settlement B' Camp, Contai, District Midnapore (hereinafter referred to as the Revenue Officer) against the writ petitioner which came to be registered as 7a Case No. 175/14t of 1978. By an order and/ or judgment passed in the aforesaid cue, the Revenue Officer determined the ceiling limit of the lands that may be retained by the writ petitioner under the Act and while determining such ceiling limit, the Revenue Officer has held that an adopted son of a raiyat cannot be as a son considered as within the meaning of 'family' as defined in section 14k (c) of the Act, for the purpose of calculating the ceiling limit of lands under section 14 (M) of the Act.

( 3 ) FEELING aggrieved by the final order ,passed by the Revenue Officer disposing of the aforesaid case and determining the ceiling limit of lands under the Act the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top