SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 168

PRABIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR, JAGDISH KUMAR
FAROOQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MAJMUDAR, A.P.SARKAR, SANJIB MISHRA

JAGDISH KUAMR MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) MD. Farooque the appellant before us claims that he owns a property No. T-44a, Rabindra Sarani, Calcutta and runs a guest house, in it. It yielded a gross amount of Rs. 4,13,144/during the year 1986-87. His earnings from this came to Rs. 5000. 00 per month approximately. In 1986, the valuation of the building was enhanced. The petitioner filed an objection. He received a notice from the assessor of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation requiring him to appear before Hearing Officer with evidence in support of his objection, under Section 188 of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. He was required to appear on 5-6-1986. As he received the letter after the aforesaid date, he would not appear but wrote a letter on 7-6-1986, requesting the assessor to fix another date. The petitioner did not get any reply but received a bill in the month of July 1987. In that bill the valuation was fixed at Rupees 4,12,365/ -. The petitioner was required to pay a net amount of Rs. 39,850. 00 as tax. The petitioner approached this Court. An order was passed in the writ petition moved by him staying the enforcement of the bill and permitting Calcutta Municipal Corpor






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top