SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 328

TARUN CHATTERJEE
DWARKANATH CHATTERJEE AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mitra, PAL

TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.

( 1 ) WRIT petitioners Nos. 1 to 5 are the joint owners of the premises Nos. 9, 7/1a and 7/1b, Lovelock Place, Calcutta-700 009 (hereinafter referred to collectively as the said premises ). Writ petitioner No. 6 has entered into an agreement on January 28, 1994, with the writ petitioners Nos. 1 to 5 to develop the said premises. By the Finance Act, 1986, with effect from October 1, 1986, Chapter XX-C consisting of Sections 269u to 269uo was inserted in the Income-tax Act, 1961, with the object of inducing the transferors and the transferees to declare the full amount of consideration in their agreements for transfer. Section 269uc of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") provides as follows :" (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), or in any other law for the time being in force, no transfer of any immovable property of such value exceeding ten lakh rupees as may be prescribed, shall be effected except after an agreement for transfer is entered into between the person who intends transferring the immovable property (hereinafter referred to as 'the transferor') and the person to whom i



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top