SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 40

A.K.SENGUPTA, SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
OBEROI BUILDING AND INVESTMENT PVT. LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bagchi

SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) PURSUANT to the direction of this court under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in computing the cost of acquisition of right shares issued by Messrs. East India Hotels Limited at Rs. 6. 25 per share as against Rs. 1. 79 taken by the Income-tax Officer ?"

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the said question as found by the Tribunal are as follows :

( 3 ) THE assessee is a company deriving income from business and other sources. It held certain shares of Messrs. East India Hotels Limited as investment. During the previous year under consideration, Messrs. East India Hotels Limited declared bonus shares as well as right shares in the holding of one share for every five shares held in both the cases. Simultaneously, it also issued new equity shares for the public. The assessee sold its right to purchase 29,000 right shares at Rs. 3. 50 per right share. As these shares were held in the investment portfolio, the surplus of the sale proceeds over the cost, if any, was assessable as short-term capital gains. On the cont


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top