SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 270

S.K.MUKHERJEE, A.K.BHATTACHARYA
PRATAP KUMAR GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
ANINDITA GANGULY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.ROY, J.R.CHATTERJI, S.DASGUPTA, S.K.MUKHERJEE, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY

S. K. MOOKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE present Revisional application is directed against Order No. 76 dated 6th May, 1992 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 14th Court, Alipore, in Matrimonial Suit No. 59 of 1988, whereby the learned Additional District Judge rejected an application preferred on behalf of the husband for expunction of Exhibits A and A-1 from the records of the case. The said two exhibits are a prescription and a medical certificate granted by Dr. Ranjit Kumar Panja, a wellknown Dermatologist and relates! to the wife/opposite party. The said two documents were tendered to the husband while he was being cross-examined and on the basis of the statement made by him in cross-examination, these were marked as exhibits in the aforesaid manner.

( 2 ) IT is pertinent to note, at this stage that the suit for divorce had been filed by the husband, Inter alia, on the ground of cruelty, predominantly mental, by alleging that the wife/opposite party had boils and scars all over the body and was thus suffering from special type of skin disease which was incurable and the marriage was solemnized on suppressing such ail-meat.

( 3 ) THE short question which has been raised









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top