S.K.MUKHERJEE, A.K.BHATTACHARYA
PRATAP KUMAR GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
ANINDITA GANGULY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE present Revisional application is directed against Order No. 76 dated 6th May, 1992 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 14th Court, Alipore, in Matrimonial Suit No. 59 of 1988, whereby the learned Additional District Judge rejected an application preferred on behalf of the husband for expunction of Exhibits A and A-1 from the records of the case. The said two exhibits are a prescription and a medical certificate granted by Dr. Ranjit Kumar Panja, a wellknown Dermatologist and relates! to the wife/opposite party. The said two documents were tendered to the husband while he was being cross-examined and on the basis of the statement made by him in cross-examination, these were marked as exhibits in the aforesaid manner.
( 2 ) IT is pertinent to note, at this stage that the suit for divorce had been filed by the husband, Inter alia, on the ground of cruelty, predominantly mental, by alleging that the wife/opposite party had boils and scars all over the body and was thus suffering from special type of skin disease which was incurable and the marriage was solemnized on suppressing such ail-meat.
( 3 ) THE short question which has been raised
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.