High Court Of Calcutta
AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA
ANANDILAL GOENKA - Appellant
Versus
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER - Respondent
C. R. 6549 (W) Of 1977
Decided On : 07/30/1992
INCOME TAX - ATTACHMENT - TRUST - JURISDICTION - TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST CHALLENGING ATTACHMENT ORDER ISSUED BY TAX RECOVERY OFFICER ON SHARES OWNED BY TRUST IN RESPECT OF ALLEGED TAX DEMAND AGAINST PRIVATE TRUST - COURT HELD THAT TAX RECOVERY OFFICER HAD NO JURISDICTION TO GO INTO QUESTION OF TITLE AND THAT SHARES COULD NOT BE ATTACHED FOR ALLEGED DEMAND AGAINST PRIVATE TRUST - WRIT APPLICATION ALLOWED.
Fact of the Case:
TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST CHALLENGED ATTACHMENT ORDER ISSUED BY TAX RECOVERY OFFICER ON SHARES OWNED BY TRUST IN RESPECT OF ALLEGED TAX DEMAND AGAINST PRIVATE TRUST.
Finding of the Court:
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER HAD NO JURISDICTION TO GO INTO QUESTION OF TITLE AND THAT SHARES COULD NOT BE ATTACHED FOR ALLEGED DEMAND AGAINST PRIVATE TRUST.
Issues: WHETHER TAX RECOVERY OFFICER HAD JURISDICTION TO GO INTO QUESTION OF TITLE.
Ratio Decidendi: POWERS OF TAX RECOVERY OFFICER ARE ANALOGOUS TO THOSE OF CIVIL COURT UNDER ORDER 21, RULE 58, OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - TAX RECOVERY OFFICER'S DUTY IS TO CONCENTRATE ON QUESTION OF POSSESSION AND DECIDE WHETHER JUDGMENT-DEBTOR IS IN POSSESSION OF PROPERTY ON HIS OWN BEHALF OR ON ACCOUNT OF OR IN TRUST FOR SOME OTHER PERSON - TAX RECOVERY OFFICER IS NOT CONCERNED WITH QUESTION OF TITLE TO PROPERTY.
Final Decision: WRIT APPLICATION ALLOWED - ATTACHMENT ORDER SET ASIDE.
( 1 ) IN this writ application, the petitioners, who are the trustees of a public charitable trust known as the Birla Seva Trust (in short "the Trust"), have challenged an order of attachment dated June 7, 1977, under Rule 26 (1) (ii) of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"), issued by the Tax Recovery Officer-II (Income-tax), Jaipur (in short "the TRO"), on the trust in respect of an alleged demand bt tax against a private trust, known as Raja Baldeodas Birla Santatikosh Trust (in short "the private trust" ). The petitioners have also challenged an order dated June 22/27, 1977, passed by the said Tax Recovery Officer rejecting the claim of the trust that the said shares were not liable to be attached for the alleged tax dues of the said private trust. The petitioners have also challenged a notice of attachment dated February 15/17, 1977, under rule 31, and a letter dated November 9, 1977, of the Tax Recovery Officer in respect of the said shares and/or dividend accruing thereon.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the Birla Seva Trust was created under a deed of trust dated June 15, 1977. The office of the trust is situated at Calcutta. The trust is the owner of, inter alia, 2,01,875 ordinary shares of Pilani Investment Corporation Ltd. (in short the "said shares" ). The shares were received by the trust from another public charitable trust called Birla Jankalyan Trust which in its turn had received the same from a private discretionary trust known as Raja Baldeodas Birla Santatikosh (in short the "private trust" ). In respect of the said shares owned by the trust a declaration under Section 153b (1) of the Companies Act, 1956, was duly filed with the public trustee on August 14, 1972. The income from the said shares has been received by the trust and utilised for public charitable purposes in accordance with the objects of the valid trust.
( 3 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to the alleged tax demand against the said private trust are, inter alia, as under : (a) The said private trust was created by a deed dated May 20, 1943, by the late Jugal Kishore Birla for the benefit of the male descendants of Raja Baldeodas Birla, their wives, widows and daughters. The said private trust, in May 1943, had received from a limited company diverse shares for being held for useful objects. The settlor and the major beneficiaries of the said private trust and the said limited company which had given the said shares decided that the said shares should be made over to a public charitable trust and, accordingly, the same were made over to the said Birla Jankalyan Trust on March 30, 1964. (b) After the said shares were transferred by the said private trust to Birla Jankalyan Trust the income and/or wealth relating to the said shares were not assessed in the hands of the private trust for the assessment years 1964-65 to 1969-70. (c) For the first time in the assessment year 1970-71, the Income-tax Officer assessing the said private trust took the view'that the trustees of the said private trust could not donate the said shares to the said Birla Jankalyan Trust and the said donation was void ab initio. He, accordingly, assessed the income in respect of the said shares in the hands of the said private trust and raised a demand. Similar assessments were made by him for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1974-75. For the assessment year 1970-71, the appeal of the said private trust against the said order of assessment was allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, but on further appeal by the Income-tax Officer, the Jaipur Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (in short "the Tribunal") upheld the order of the Income-tax Officer and held that the transfer of the said shares by the said private trust was void and the income was liable to be assessed in the hands of the said private trust. Against the said order of the Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, a reference is pen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.