SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 168

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
HARDEODAS AGARWALL TRUST – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY SINGH CHORARIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BANSAL, D.M.CHOUDHARY, DINABANDHU DAS, M.K.SINGH

B. PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) - The Defendant No. 1 in Title Suit 3/90 pending in the court of the Assistant District Judge, 4th court Alipore has called in question about the proprierty of the order No. 76 dated 2. 8. 95 rejecting the prayer of the revision petitioner filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the C. P. Code.

( 2 ) THE opposite party-plaintiff has filed the suit against the present petitioner who is the defendant No. 1 in the trial court for specific performance of contract of the suit properties. On the ground that the defendant No. 1, which is a trust, had executed a deed of agreement on or about 12. 8. 89 whereby it had agreed to execute the register sale deed on receiving full consideration amount under the, agreement. The earnest money of 2 tars was said to have been advanced. But, when the defendant Hardeodas Agarwall Trust failed to perform its part of contract, a suit for specific performance of contract was brought against it.

( 3 ) THE petitioner after appearance has flied the written statement, inter alia, alleging that the suit as filed by the plaintiff is not maintainable inasmuch as the other members of the trust have not been impleaded in the suit. It has been furt










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top