BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, VIDYA NAND
ANAND DAMANI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 2 ) IT is not necessary to consider the facts of this case in details in view of the limited submissions made by Mr. Balai Chandra Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner that in the instant case as admittedly one more vital document viz. , B. D. Mall's challans, which was specifically referred to at paragraphs 1, 7 and 28 of the detention order was not supplied in spite of demand being made by the defence and secondly, it was submitted by Mr. Roy that some of the documents on which the detaining authority relied on in the order of detention were illegible and accordingly procedura
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.