SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 244

S.K.MUKHERJEE, AMITAVA LALA
HARSHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SOMADEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.TIVARI, M.S.TIVARI

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act for drawing up a proceeding for contempt for alleged violation of the orders, dated 4th May, 1996 and 1st June, 1996, passed by the learned Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta, in Misc. Case No. 2237 of 1994.

( 2 ) LEARNED advocate, appearing in support of the application, strongly relied upon the language of Section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act, and, on the basis, argued that he has a right to pray that the matter be dealt with in contempt jurisdiction of this court, although the orders alleged to have been violated had been passed by a subordinate Court. It is to be noted that the order was passed by the learned Judge of the court below, in connection with a proceeding under Order 39 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court below, being a Court of records, has ample jurisdiction to take appropriate steps for violation of its orders, including by invocation of provisions of Order 39 Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. If all these available remedies are allowed to be skipped over, the inevitable result will be opening up of flood gate for such application before thi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top