SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 436

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, DIPAK PRAKAS KUNDU
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
AIR SURVEY CO. OF INDIA (P. ) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOITRA, J.P.KHAITAN, Sunil Mukherji

( 1 ) THE following question of law has been referred for our opinion : "whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee was entitled to investment allowance under Section 32a on the aircraft radio ?"

( 2 ) THE answer to this question revolves around the interpretation to be put to Section 32a of the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly, the expression "manufacture or production of any article or thing" as occurring in Sub-section (2) of that section.

( 3 ) THE assessee is Air Survey Co. of India (P.) Ltd. , and the assessment year relevant for our purpose is 1983-84. The assessee derives its income from surveying, mapping, aerial photography and aero-magnetic photography done for the Surveyor-General of India and the Atomic Mineral Division of Government of India. The assessee claimed investment allowance under Section 32a of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the aircraft-radio purchased in the previous year relevant to assessment year 1982-83. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) rejected the assessee's claim on the ground that the activity of the assessee could not be called as manufacture or product

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top