S.B.SINHA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
KARTICK PRASAD GORAI – Appellant
Versus
NEAMI PRASAD GORAI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE instant first appeal is at the instance of defendants No. 1, 3 and 4 and is directed against the judgment and decree dated August 30, 1990 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Katwa, District Burdwan in Title Suit No. 6 of 1989 decreeing the said suit in preliminary form after declaring plaintiff's 1/3rd share in the suit property and further declaring that two sale deeds viz. Exhibit-A and Exhibit-A1 were illegal, void, collusive and fictitious and that those were not binding upon plaintiff/respondent No. 1.
( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 brought the aforesaid Title Suit No. 6 of 1989 for partition after declaring that Exhibit-A and Exhibit-A1 alleged to have been executed by Dwijapada Gorai, the father of plaintiff, defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2 were illegal, void, collusive and fictitious and that those were not binding upon the plaintiff.
( 3 ) THE case made out by the respondent No. 1 as per amended plaint was as follows :
( 4 ) ONE Dwijapade Gorai, the father of the plaintiff, defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2 was the absolute owner of the suit proiperty. The said Dwijapada Gorai died intestate on August 2, 1989 leaving tw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.