SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 139

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
MACKINTOSH BURN LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITAVA GHOSH, NIRMALENDU BHATTACHARJI, Subal Moitra

B. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of Employees' State Insurance Corporation and is directed against Order No. 3 dated March 10, 1998 and Order No. 8 dated April 2, 1998, passed by the learned Judge, Employees' Insurance Court, Calcutta, in Tender Case No. 7 of 1998. By the first order, the learned trial Judge entertained an application under Section 75 (2b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Act), filed by opposite parry 1 by directing opposite party 1 to deposit a sum of Rs. 15,499/-with the petitioner and restrained the petitioner from proceedings further or from giving effect to the disputed demand notice till the disposal of the aforesaid Tender Case No. 7 of 1998.

( 2 ) BY second order, viz. , Order No. 8 dated April 2, 1998, the learned trial Judge passed a direction upon the petitioner to show cause why action should not be taken against the petitioner for non-compliance of the previous order of the Court. By the said order, the petitioner was further directed to release the captive money withdrawn from the bank by the petitioner.

( 3 ) THE only question that arises for determi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top