SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 425

Y.R.MEENA, RANJAN KUMAR MAZUMDER
MANDIRA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


( 1 ) ON the reference application, the Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, set out at page 7 of the statement of case for our opinion : "whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the rent received by the assessee from the house property is assessable as income from other sources or income from house property ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee, Smt. Mandira Mukherjee, is the daughter of Sailendra Nath Roy. A deed of settlement dated March 8, 1951, was made by the late Amarendra Nath Roy, grandfather of Smt. Mandira Mukherjee. Under the deed of settlement, he had settled the property valued at Rs. 3,00,000, including the property in question. Under the deed, he made Shri Sailendra Nath Roy, his only son, a trustee and also made provision for maintenance of his daughter and grand-daughter. As per the terms of the settlement deed dated March 8, 1951, a sum of Rs. 10,000 was to be spent on the occasion of marriage of the assessee and an amount of Rs. 100 per month be spent on her education. After defraying these expenses, Shri Sailendra Nath Roy was allowed to enjoy the estate as absolute owner thereof till his life time.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top