SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 481

High Court Of Calcutta
S. B. SINHA, MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
SYED WASIQUE BAHADUR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
W. P.  1652 (W)  Of  1999
Decided On : 08/30/1999

Advocates Appeared:
D.N.RAY, INDRAJIT SEN, P.Dhar, Prodyot Dutta

The renovation of a historical building should be carried out in a manner that preserves its historical value.

Headnote:

HERITAGE BUILDING - RENOVATION - Nawab Bahadur Institution, Murshidabad - Whether the renovation of the school building would destroy its historical value - Held, no - The renovation work should be carried out keeping in view the suggestions made by the Independent Architect.

Fact of the Case:

The Nawab Bahadur Institution, Murshidabad is a historical building built by Munni Begum, the wife of Mirzafar. It was converted into a school after the abolition of Nawab Nazim. The building is in a dilapidated condition and requires thorough repair. The State of West Bengal invited tenders for renovating and repairing the building. The Nawab Bahadur's Institution Ex-Students' Association requested the Superintending Engineer to stop all processes in regard to any kind of renovation work at the building.

Finding of the Court:

The court appointed an independent Architect to inspect the building. The Architect reported that the building is in a very delicate state and the first floor roof is showing signs of collapse. The use of reinforced cement concrete can save the building by providing a solid, stable, and lighter roof. The court also noted that the intention of the State Government is to preserve the overall outlook of the building as far as practicable.

Issues: Whether the renovation of the school building would destroy its historical value.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the absence of the building having been declared a heritage building, it is not possible to accede to the petitioner's contention to make renovation in the same manner as was suggested by the Superintending Engineer, Archaeological Survey of India, Calcutta circle.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ application by directing the respondents to carry out the renovation work keeping in view the suggestions made by the Independent Architect.

S. B. SINHA, ACJ.

( 1 ) THIS application in the nature of Public Interest Litigation has been filed by a former student of Nawab Bahadur Institution, Murshidabad praying for the following reliefs:-" (A) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents specifically the Respondents Nos. 2, 6 and 7 to forbear from doing anything pursuant to and in furtherence to the said tender a copy being annexure 'g' to this application which may spoil, disfigure or destruct any portion of Nawab Bahadur Institution and its original fabric. (b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent Nos. 2 and 6 to renovate and/or repair the school building by taking and completely following the instructions of Archacologists and Excavationists in the matter of preservation of the original fabric of the school building. (c) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents Nos. 2 and 6 not to construct R. C. C. ceilings in the said school building and/or to do any tear and wear for such purpose. "

( 2 ) THE petitioner contends that the said school is of immense historical legacy and heritage. It was built by Munni Begum, the wife of Mirzafar and was known as Mubaraq Mahal. It was in that building that Mubaraq-ud-daula, the fourth son of the said Mirzafar and Munni Begam was born and brought up. The said Mubaraq-Ud-Daula was later on coroneted as the Nawab Nazim of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. In course of passing of time, however, the said building was converted into a school. The responsibility of maintaining the said school after abolition of Nawab Nazim was taken by Government of West Bengal. Admittedly, the building is in a dilapidated condition and required a thorough repair. The petitioner contends that although he is not against renovation of the building but keeping in view its heritage value the renovation and repair works should be carried on in terms of the letter dated 23. 10. 98 as contained in annexure 'f' to the writ application which is as follows :-"enclosed herewith a copy of the letter received from the Ex-students Association of Nawab Bahadur's Institution at Murshidabad which is self explanatory. While appreciating the concern of Ex-students for preservation of Heritage Buildings at Murshidabad, it may be mentioned here that if we consider Murshidabad a Heritage Town, then it is the duty of all of us to preserve the original Fabric of all heritage buildings of Murshidabad. Further, I am happy to record that it is the only town besides Calcutta where we notice so much of public awareness for Heritage Buildings. In this context while agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Ex-students on the above referred letter it is suggested that R. C. C, roofs are never advisable to a Haritage Buildings. It would not only sport the original fabric of the Building, but also it won't be compatable to the Building. Therefore, it is requested kindly intervene into the matter and see that justice is done in repairing the said Heritage Building at Murshidabad. In this context if any technical advice is required we would certainly extend it. "

( 3 ) HOWEVER, despite the same and tender had been invited by the State of West Bengal in a newspaper, viz. Ganashakti dated 23rd November, 1998 for renovating and/or repairing the said building.

( 4 ) THE Nawab Bahadur's Institution Ex-Students' Association by a letter dated 30. 11. 98 requested the Superintending Engineer to stop all processes in regard to any kind of renovation work at the building of Nawab Bahadur's Institution. The petitioner also contends that the State of West Bengal has constituted a Commission for preservation of the Heritage Building.

( 5 ) AN Affidavit-in-Opposition has been filed by Executive Engineer, P. W. D wherein it has been denied and disputed that by renovation of the said school historical curvings or the images or the sculptures or the fabrics with which the structure of the said school building was originally built up, wou






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top