SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 628

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
SPANDAN DIAGNOSTIC AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
RITENDRA NATH GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.R.CHATTERJI, R.N.MAHATO, RAMESWAR BHATTACHARYA, Sudhis Das Gupta

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a Judgment and Order dated 11-5-99 passed by Shri B. Das, Civil Judge, Senior Division, 1st Court, Midnapore in Other Suit No. 57 of 1999 whereby and whereunder he allowed the application for injunction filed by the Plaintiff-Respondent herein.

( 2 ) THE basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. In a suit between Rathindra Nath Ghosh (sic) and Bratindra Nath Ghosh, the predecessors-in-interest of the Plaintiff and the Defendants-Respondents, a compromise was entered into which having been recorded, a consent decree was passed 35-5-89 in J. S. No. 137 of 1981. The compromise petition which formed part of decree contained the following stipulation:-"the dwelling and adjoining land in front of homestead obtained by the parties on which they live, if they like to sell that or any part of that, then they have to inform other side by notice, obtaining the notice if a party is incapable to buy that then the said property can be transferred to other. "

( 3 ) ADMITTEDLY no individual notice was given pursuant to the aforementioned agreement to the plaintiff-respondent but an advertisement was issued in Ananda Bazar Patriaka to the ef



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top