GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE, NURE ALAM CHOWDHURY
MAHESH MAHATO – Appellant
Versus
SANKAR KUMAR MAHATO – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revisional application filed by the petitioners accused persons is directed against the order dated 5-12-1998 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Midnapore whereby the learned Sessions Judge cancelled interim bail granted to the petitioners by the learned SDJM, Jhargram in G. R. Case No. 333/ 92 which was initially started under Sections 147/148/326/307/379, I. P. C. and later on Section 302, I. P. C. was also added thereto as the victim succumbed to the injuries later in the hospital: The incident took place on 30-6-1998. The FIR was lodged on 2-7-1998 at 12. 25 p. m. giving explanation for the delay in lodging the FIR. The victim died at the hospital on 2-7-1998 at 6. 30 p. m. On the prayer of the 1. 0. on 4-7-1998 Section 302, I. P. C. was added. On 10-7-1998 an application for anticipatory bail was filed by the petitioners before the learned Sessions Judge, Midnapore and the learned Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners on 10-8-1998. In view of the order of anticipatory bail the petitioners surrendered before the learned SDJM, Jhargram on 13-8-1998 and. 17-8-1998 in batches and they were granted interim bail by the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.