RANJAN KUMAR MAZUMDER, Y.R.MEENA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
J. K. INDUSTRIES LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this reference application made under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for our opinion :"for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80 : whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the direction of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to withdraw the depreciation on assets allowed by the Assessing Officer, though not claimed by the assessee ? for the assessment year 1979-80 : whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directing the computation of capital gain/loss on the sale of assets either by taking into consideration the original cost of the assets or their written down value after giving effect to his appellate order (i. e. , withdrawing depreciation) ?"
( 2 ) IN response to a notice under Section 139 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the assessee filed the returns on November 30, 1978, showing loss of Rs. 7,07,39,219. Those returns were revised and the assessee filed a revised return. In that, he reduced the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.