SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 330

AJOY NATH RAY
J. K. INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MULLICK, PAL

AJAY NATH RAY, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ application the assessee claims an acceptance of two declarations filed by the assessee in respect of the two assessment years, i. e. , 1991-92 and 1992-93, whereby the assessee invoked the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the assessee's declaration for these assessment years, the outstanding amounts were approximately Rs. 95 lakhs and Rs, 2 crores 94 lakhs and the assessee offered to settle by payments of Rs. 47 lakhs and Rs. 1 crore 47 lakhs, approximately, respectively.

( 3 ) THE designated authority turned down the request on the ground that according to the Revenue there was no tax Outstanding for these assessment years.

( 4 ) THE case of the Revenue at that time was, and before me also has been that adjustments were made by the Revenue prior to the coming into operation of the Finance (No. 2) Act of 1998 and thus there being no outstanding, the assessee had nothing to settle up.

( 5 ) ACCORDING to the Revenue large amounts of money were adjusted at several times during the year 1996 and once each in December, 1995, and January 1997. Details of these are given in the petition and there is no dispute in regard to the amount
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top