SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 108

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA
DIBYENDU GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
UTTARA CHOWDHURY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JOYMALYA BAGCHI, PRABIR KUMAR MITRA.

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is for quashing of a proceeding being C. R Case No. 97 of 1996 arising out of I complaint under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant opposite party filed a petition of complaint on 17-10-1996 alleging commission of an offence under Sections 406/ 420 of the Indian Penal Code. In petition of complaint it is stated that the complainant is the Secretary of Bangavani Institution and the accused is known to the complainant and is an connected with the Institution. It is also stated that the complainant had a good relation with the accused and taking advantage of such good relation he earned the confidence of the complainant and on 1-7-1994 he took from the complainant some documents with promise to return those documents. It was alleged that these documents are valuable documents relating to the Institution and spite of repeated demands made by the complainant the accused did not return those documents. It was alleged that this way the accused/petitioner committed an offence of cheating and also criminal breach of trust.

( 2 ) THE learned Advocate forth petitioner submits that on receipt of the aforesaid petition of complaint, wh





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top