SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 487

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA
NITYA NANDA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
ALO RANI GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.CHAKRAVARTY, S.Ghosh, SANJIB MAL, Sudhis Das Gupta

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision under S. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against a judgment dated May 28, 1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court at Alipore whereby the Misc. Appeal filed by the respondents against the order dated June 30, 1992 passed by Sri. S. L. Biswas, learned Assistant District Judge, 9th Court at Alipore was allowed and the aforesaid order dated June 30, 1992 was set aside.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS in the present civil revisional application are the plaintiffs in a suit filed in the year 1984 The suit is for partition and relates to the entire assets of the business being carried out under the name and style of 'dacca Cinema Cabin' at 56, Park Street, Calcutta. In this pending suit the plaintiff-petitioners filed an application under Order 40 Rule 1 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure for appointment of a Receiver. Vide the order number 66, dated March 29, 1988 the learned Assistant District Judge seized of the aforesaid suit dismissed the application of the petitioners-plaintiffs by holding that on proper consideration of the circumstances it was not just and convenient to appoint any Receiver in respect of the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top