SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 521

SUJIT BARMAN ROY
ALLAUDDIN SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, H.DEY, J.BAGCHI, Kallol Mondal, S.CHATTERJEE, SUBHASISH PACHHAL, SUDIPTA MOITRA

S. BARMAN ROY, J.

( 1 ) BY this application petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 25. 6. 99 passed by the learned Special Judge (N. D. P. S. Act), Howrah in T. R. No. 8 of 1998 by which learned trial court split up the case of the petitioner and another from the case of other accused and directed separate trial of all the accused except the petitioner and another.

( 2 ) CASE in short is that the petitioner and others are accused in the aforementioned case for alleged commission of various offences under Narcotic Drug and Psychotrophic Substances Act. When the petitioner and other accused persons were in custody in connection with the aforesaid case, LIC Town Police Station at Balasore instituted another case being LIC Town P. S. Case No. 209 of 1998 under sections 20 (B), 21 and 29 of the N. D. P. S. Act corresponding to Special Case No. 64/98 against the petitioner and others. Pursuant to a production warrant issued by the Special Court (N. D. P. S. Act), Balasore in connection with the aforesaid Balasore case, petitioner and one Naushaba alias Sumitra Dutta were produced before the Balasore Court and since then the petitioner and Naushaba Anjum are in custody at Balasor


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top