SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 180

MALAY KUMAR BASU
NISHI KANTA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Narayan Chandra Bhattacharya, SHRABANI MISHRA, SUKUMAR GHOSH

MALAY KUMAR BASU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision application is directed against the judgment and order dated 11. 11. 1998 passed by Shri S. Bhattacharyya, S. D. J. M. , Diamond Harbour in Misc. Case No. 46 of 1995/t. R. No. 379/1998 under Section 125 of Cr. P. C. By this order the learned S. D. J. M. allowed a maintenance petition under Section 125, Cr. P. C. filed by Sarama Halder (wife of the present revisional applicant) and directed the revisional applicant (opposite party in that case) to pay maintenance to the petitioner at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month. In this revisional application the appellant/husband has prayed for an order setting aside the impugned order of the S. D. J. M. on the ground that the same is illegal and unsustainable.

( 2 ) THE relationship of husband and wife between the parties is undisputed. Admittedly, the applicant married the respondent-Sara ma, according to Hindu rites. The case of the petitioner-wife before the learned Magistrate was that the opposite party-husband used to press her for fetching money from her father but her father being a poor man and unable to meet the demand, her husband and her in-laws used to torture her in various ways including









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top