SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 178

AMITAVA LALA
MAHENDRA KUMAR PODDAR – Appellant
Versus
BANSAL BUILDERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISVANATH MITRA, SOUMEN SEN

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application, basically, for the purpose of passing an order for dissolution of the registered partnership firm, M/s Bansal Distributors and further order for the purpose of winding up of the affairs of the partnership firm along with various incidental prayers including injunction etc.

( 2 ) THIS application is made under a suit being C. S. No. 527 of 2000.

( 3 ) IN the said suit, an application was made for the purpose of various interlocutory reliefs.

( 4 ) ULTIMATELY, by an order dated 28th February, 2000, a Single Bench of this High Court was pleased to refer the disputes and controversies between the parties involved in a suit to an appropriate forum in view of the Arbitration Clause for appointment of arbitrator with a rider that the arbitration clause does not provide the machinery for referring the disputes for adjudication by the Arbitrator as no specific name has been mentioned nor the same has been appointed.

( 5 ) FROM such order, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner herein when an Appeal Bench of this Court by an order dated 28th March, 2000, gave directions to the petitioner to make an appropriate application for interlocutor






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top