A.K.MATHUR, ALTAMAS KABIR
UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
AMIT JALAN – Respondent
( 1 ) ALL these four appeals and the stay applications arise from a common order, therefore, all these four appeals and the stay applications are disposed of by the common order. Two appeals and stay applications are from the Original Side and two appeals and stay applications are from the Appellate Side. The Appeal Nos. T. 334 and 336 of 2000 and stay applications being T. No. 333 and 335 of 2000 are from Original Side and appeals being MAT No. 869 and 870 of 2000 and stay applications being CAN No. 2274, and 2275 of 2000 are from the Appellate Side. In all these matters the sole question is that whether all the students who have not been able to secure 65% of the total attendance are entitled to appear in regular examination of LLB of 5 years duration or not. All the petitioners are students of 1st year, 2nd year, 3rd year, 4th year and 5th year and they are short of minimum required attendance i. e. 65%. Therefore, the matter was agitated by the students through their Union to the Faculty of Law as well as to the University for condonation of their attendance and to permit them to appear in the ensuing examinations of law for 1999.
( 2 ) THERE are two classes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.