SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 212

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA
MARUTI EQUIPMENTS PVT. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE NATH GHOSH, NANDALAL PRADHAN, PRADIP GHOSH, SOUMEN KUMAR GHOSH

D. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) -THIS revisional application is for quashing of a proceeding being case No. C-41 of 1993 under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

( 2 ) THE opposite party No. 2 filed a petition of complaint before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta alleging commission of an offence under section 138 of the N. I. Act against the present petitioners. It was alleged in the said complaint that the accused/petitioner No. 2 issued a cheque bearing No. 156276 dated 10. 2. 92 for Rs. 7,75,000/- drawn on State Bank of India, Vatva I. E. Ahmedabad. The said cheque was presented for encashment by the complainant with State Bank of India, Baghbazar, Calcutta. The said cheque was dishonored by the Bank, which by its debit memo dated 25. 11. 92 informed the petitioner that the said cheque was returned unpaid for the reason of "insufficient Funds". The complainant/o. p. No. 2 issued a demand notice on 2. 12. 92, which was received by the accused petitioner on 10. 12. 92. On failure to make the payment by the accused within the stipulated period of 15 days the petition of complaint was filed.

( 3 ) ON receipt of the said complaint the learned Magistrate too













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top