ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
GOLAM MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
SUPDT. N. R. S. MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL – Respondent
( 1 ) ALL these three writ petitions were heard together. The first two writ petitions are concerned with identical issues and insofar as the third writ petition is concerned the questions raised are a little different. Since in the first two writ petitions same questions are involved, they are taken up first.
( 2 ) IN Re : Din Mohammad - The case of the writ petitioner is that pursuant to a tender notice dated 9-6-2000 the petitioner submitted a tender for supply of dietary articles for the Indoor patients of the Hospital with 1890 beds for the period from 1st July, 2000 to 31st March, 2001 or any further period extended by the appropriate authority. Along with the said tender a schedule of rates for different articles have also been appended.
( 3 ) FROM the perusal of the schedule it will appear that the tender is invited in respect of various food items. The writ petitioner also asserts that he is an existing supplier. The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that even though the petitioner has submitted his tender complying with all the formalities under the tender notice but his tender has not been considered in view of a resolution which was taken by t
REFERRED TO : Air India v. Cochin International Airport Ltd.
Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner, Ullashnagar Municipal Corporation
Bhargav Bhusan Press v. Bihar State Text Book Publication Corporation
Dutt Associates Private Ltd. v. Indo Merchantiles Pvt. Ltd.
Poddar Steel Corporation v. Ganesh Engineering Works
Bareilly Development Authority v. Ajay Pal Singh
Shri Harminder Singh v. Union of India
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.