SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 627

TARUN CHATTERJEE, S.N.BHATTACHARJEE
LEONHARDT ANDRA AND PARTNER – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PAL

S. N. BHATTACHARJEE J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following questions have been referred to this court :" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Indo-German agreement for double taxation, prior to its amendment in 1984, the sums received by the assessee for design and technical services for the construction work, i. e. , the second bridge over the river Hooghly is chargeable to income-tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true interpretation of the Indo-German agreement for double taxation, the transfer of the drawings, designs and technical services under the collaboration agreement constituted an out and out transfer of such rights and as such the sums received therefor could be treated as royalty for the purpose of the Indo-German Double Taxation Agreement and liable to Indian Income-tax ? (3) Whether, the sum received by the assessee for the supply of designs, drawings and technical services constituted 'industrial and commercial profits' for the purpose of the Indo-Germ












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top