High Court Of Calcutta
BARIN GHOSH
DEBASHIS GANGULY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
W. P. 15503 Of 1993
Decided On : 01/12/2000
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 - SECTION 74(1) - WEST BENGAL MOTOR VEHICLES RULES, 1989 - RULE 122 - ROUTE PERMIT - GRANT OF PERMIT - RENEWAL OF PERMIT - COUNTER-SIGNATURE - PUBLIC NEED - AGREEMENT BETWEEN STATES - RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENT - VALIDITY OF PERMIT - CANCELLATION OF PERMIT - RE-CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS - SOUTH BENGAL STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION - INACTION - FAILURE TO PLY BUSES - QUASHING OF PERMIT - RE-GRANT OF PERMIT - PROCEDURE.
Fact of the Case:
A writ petition was filed challenging the grant of a route permit to the South Bengal State Transport Corporation (SBSTC) for operating a bus service on the Asansol-Dumka route. The petitioner contended that SBSTC had not plied any buses on the route despite obtaining the permit in 1993 and had expressed an intent not to do so, rendering the grant of the permit redundant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that SBSTC had not taken any steps to ply buses on the route in question for 12 years, despite the public need for the service. It also noted that SBSTC was seeking a new permit instead of retaining the existing one.
Issues: 1. Whether the grant of the route permit to SBSTC was valid in light of its failure to operate buses on the route for 12 years? 2. Whether the permit should be quashed and the State Transport Authority directed to re-consider applications for the permit?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the permit granted to SBSTC was vitiated by its inaction and failure to fulfill the public need for the bus service. It also noted that SBSTC was not seeking to retain the permit and was instead seeking a new one. The court further held that the State Transport Authority should re-consider the applications for the permit, excluding SBSTC's application, and grant a permit to a person who was still willing to operate a bus service on the route.
Final Decision: The court quashed the permit granted to SBSTC and directed the State Transport Authority to re-consider the applications for the permit within two months, excluding SBSTC's application. It also directed that the re-consideration be done after giving notice to each of the eligible applicants.
( 1 ) THE scheme of the 1988 Act, as appears to me, authorises the Transport Authority to formulate a route from one termini to another provided one of the terminis falls within its jurisdiction. Once such route is formulated, such Transport Authority can grant permit to ply stage carriage on the said formulated route. If, however, the route in question falls in the jurisdiction of the another authority, counter-signature of such another Authority is required. In order to obtain such counter-signature, steps as are required to be taken for obtaining a route permit are also required to be taken. In the event, no such counter-signature is obtained, the route permit would not be valid within the territorial jurisdiction of the Transport Authority whose counter-signature was required but has not been obtained. The same principle is also applicable in relation to inter-State routes. If a State has formulated the route from one stage to another, that State may grant a route permit on the said route but that route permit will not be valid in the said State if the other State does not grant counter-signature on the route permit. In order to obtain such counter-signature from the other State, steps as are required to be taken for obtaining the permit are also required to be taken. The Act provides that in the event if there be bilateral agreements between the States, it would not be necessary for the permit-holder to take steps for obtaining grant of permit while approaching to obtain the counter-signature. A democratic State enters into an agreement with another democratic State keeping in mind the public need. In the instant case, keeping in mind such public need, the State of West Bengal and the State of Bihar has formulated a route and has entered into an agreement. It has specified that in the said route one permit shall be issued by the State of Bihar and the other by the State of West Bengal. In addition to the number mentioned above, other permits may be granted, provided steps are taken to obtain the same by following the usual procedure. But in so far as these two permits are concerned, to obtain the permit, steps are to be taken as are required but to obtain the counter-signature, steps are not to be taken as are required to obtain a permit. In other words, for these two permits, by reason of the reciprocal arrangement, counter-signature would be granted as a matter of course by the other State, if one State grants a permit.
( 2 ) HAVING regard to the nature of the public demand, not only the route was formulated but the number of stage carriages to be plied was also ascertained. In order to fulfil such demand, though the agreement is dated 27-5-88, advertisement inviting applications for obtaining such permit was issued on 11-6-91 by the State Transport Authority, West Bengal. Very many persons including the petitioner and the South Bengal State Transport Corporation applied to obtain such permit to the State Transport Authority, West Bengal. The permit was granted in favour of the South Bengal State Transport Corporation. Such grant having been challenged successfully by the petitioner in a writ petition filed in this Court, the same was cancelled and the matter was directed to be decided once again afresh. On the basis thereof, on 16-6-93 a decision was taken by the State Transport Authority, West Bengal to grant such permit once again to South Bengal State Transport Corporation. In terms thereof, in 1993 itself, South Bengal State Transport Corporation was granted the Permit No. P. St. P-5/93 (I/s) to ply a bus on the route in question, i. e. from Asansol to Dumka. On an allegation that despite such grant, the South Bengal State Transport Corporation has not plied any bus ever on the route in question and, therefore, has expressed an intent not to ply any bus on the said route and, therefore, the grant of the one and the only permit in favour of the South Bengal State Transport Corporation has become red
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.