SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 312

SATYABRATA SINHA, HRISHIKESH BANERJI
SAKAL GORE – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, BAR LIBRARY CLUB, HIGH COURT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SAMRAT SEN, Sarkar

SATYABRATA SINGH, HRISHIKESH BANERJI

( 1 ) LEAVE in terms of prayer (a) is granted. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is applicable in relation to Bar Library Club. The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to (a) every factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port and railway company (b) every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force in relation to shops and establishments in a State, in which ten or more persons are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months and (c) such other establishments or class of establishments, in which ten or more employees are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months, as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf. Clauses (a) and (d) of the said provisions admittedly can have no application in the instant case.

( 2 ) THE question raised herein is whether the respondent is a 'shop1 or an 'establishment' within the meaning of the provisions of West Bengal Shops and Establishments Act, 1963. The word 'shop' has been defined in Section 2 Sub-section (13) of the said A






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top