SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 302

S.B.SINHA, HRISHIKESH BANERJI
PARLE PRODUCTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUBIR MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNAVA GHOSH, Dipak Kumar, DIPAK PAUL, S.S.ROY, SOUMYA MAJUMDAR

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act raises a question as to whether an employee who had suffered injury while travelling in a train at the hands of some hooligans is entitled to compensation from the employer under the Act.

( 2 ) THE claimant-respondent was working as a Territory Supervisor and was looking after the sales of the products of the appellant-company. He was directed to attend a conference at Puri on June 27, 1998. The said conference was organised by the appellant. The claimant-respondent along with his other colleagues left Calcutta by Jagannath Express for Puri in the night of June 26, 1998 to attend the conference but during the journey he was assaulted and thrown out of the Railway compartment as a result whereof he sustained multiple injuries including head injury. The petitioner as a result of such injuries became permanently physically disabled. He was only 23 years old at the relevant time and his monthly salary was Rs. 2337/- at the time of accident.

( 3 ) THE learned Tribunal below upon taking into consideration the materials on record allowed the application filed under Section 4 of the Workmen's Compensati












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top