SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 100

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
BULA KUNDU – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL KUMAR KUNDU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JYOTIRMOY BHATTACHARYA, RABINDRA NATH MAHATO

B. BHATTACHARYA. J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is at the instance of an opposite party in a proceeding for pre-emption under section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act ("act") and is directed against order dated September 23, 1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Midnapore in Judicial Misc. Appeal No. 68 of 1994 thereby reversing order dated April 21, 1994 passed by the learned Munsif, Garhbeta in Judicial Misc. Case No. 22 of 1991.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties filed the aforesaid Misc. Case No. 22 of 1991 under section 8 of the Act for pre-emption of sale effected through a registered deed dated March 27, 1989 in favour of the present petitioner on the ground of adjoining ownership.

( 3 ) THE aforesaid application was contested by the present petitioner by filing written objection thereby contending, inter alia, that the opposite parties were merely co-sharers of adjoining holding but could not be said to be adjoining owners of the property transferred and as such the application was liable to be dismissed.

( 4 ) THE learned trial Judge on consideration of the materials on record held that in v

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top