SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 252

AMITAVA LALA
JAYMAC LASETRON (P. ) LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.SHOME, J.P.KHAITAN

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioner, virtually, wanted withdrawal, recalling, cancellation, etc. , of the orders passed by the authority dated February 13, 1996, August 3, 1999, September 7, 1999, and a communication dated November 9, 1999. In addition thereto further other order of refund collected by the appropriate respondents and not to give effect and/or further effect of the orders or communications as aforesaid. In all, the other prayers are incidental to the main relief as prayed for as above.

( 2 ) FIRSTLY, it is to be remembered that the instant application was taken out on April 6, 2000, long after the aforesaid happenings.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, on January 31, 1983, an agreement was entered into between Orient Beverages Ltd. (the lessor) and one Jaymac India (P.) Ltd. , the original defaulter in the proceedings, in terms whereof the lessor let out such company 11th floor of premises No. 50, Chowring-hee Road, Calcutta, covering an area of 5,386 sq. ft. (the said premises) for a period of 34 years up to February 28, 2015, against payment of Rs. 9,49,680 as premium.

( 4 ) THE agreement provided that the lessor shall execute and reg












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top