SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 260

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, MALAY KUMAR BASU
NARAYAN PRASAD LOHIA – Appellant
Versus
NIKUNJ KUMAR LOHIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jayanta Mitra, N.PATHERIA, S.PAL CHAUDHARY, SOUMEN SEN

V. K. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 17th November 1998 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in A. P. No. 53 of 1998 whereby the application filed by the Respondents for setting aside the award was allowed and the award was set aside by the learned single Judge. The Respondents in the application for setting aside the Award had sought a declaration that the arbitral award made and published by the two Arbitrators was void and invalid, unenforceable and not binding on the parties and had accordingly sought the relief of setting aside of the said award and for passing of the consequential orders. The award in question appears to have been passed by the Arbitrators, Sri S. S. Jain and Sri P. K. Khaitan. It appears to have been passed on 6th October, 1996. How did the Arbitrators come to be appointed in the very first place, whether there was in existence any arbitration agreement providing for their appointment, and whether any reference had been made to the Arbitrators of the disputes and differences between the parties are all matters which themselves are not free from controversies, doubts, disputes and differences. Since w

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top