SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 266

MALAY KUMAR BASU
DUKHISHYAM BENUPANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.Thakur, S.N.S.ALQUADRI, T.Ghosh

MALAY KUMAR BASU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Section 397 read with S. 401 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 9-10-96 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 4th Court, Calcutta in complaint case No. C/298 of 95. The relevant facts leading to the filing of this application may be summarised as follows :-ACCORDING to the petitioner, the O. P. Nos. 1 and 2 M. P. Agarwala and Umethmal Dugar contravened the provisions of Cl. (b and d) of sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 during the financial year, 1993 and thereby allegedly committed an offence punishable under Section 56 of the said Act. Accordingly, the petitioner being competent officer of the Enforcement Directorate, Foreign Exchange Regulations Act filed a complaint in 1995 before the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta and the complaint was numbered as C-298/95. In the body of that complaint names of 8 prosecution witnesses including that of the complainant were given. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance of the offence against the two accused and issued summons upon them and in response thereto th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top