SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 487

MALAY KUMAR BASU
NANDINI CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
ARUP HARI CHATTERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.BHATTACHARJEE, S.C.DAS GUPTA

MALAY KUMAR BASU, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under S. 24 of the Code of Civil procedure the applicant Smt. Nandini Chatterjee has prayed for transfer of the Acts (VIII) Case No. 247/96 from the Court of Additional District Judge, 5th Court Alipore to any other Court of competent jurisdiction. The grounds on which such a transfer has been sought for may be summarised as follows.

( 2 ) WHILE the above case was pendingbefore the said Court of Additional District Judge, Alipore, O. P. husband Arup Chatterjee filed a petition praying for interim custody of their minor daughter, Anusua Chatterjee, where against the petitioner wife filed a written objection on September 30, 1999. The Presiding Officer of that Court Shri Tushar Bhattacharya who had joined that Court that every month, that is, September, 1999 while dealing with that the petition of the O. P. husband passed orders on different occasions which were not favourable to her and which according to her suffered from various infirmities. For example, on the date which he fixed on October 1, 1999 for appearance of the minor daughter before him in his Chamber, to the surprise of the petitioner, the O. P. husband entered into the Chamb










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top