SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 500

S.N.BHATTACHARJEE
PUNIT DAS – Appellant
Versus
KANAILAL DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SUDHAKAR BISWAS

S. N. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 16-12-1980 passed by the first appellat Court in Title Appeal No. 455 of 1980 reversing the judgment dated 4-8-1980 passed by the Munsif, 2nd Court, Contai in Title Suit No. 67 of 1970.

( 2 ) ). The grand father of the plaintiffs purchased 8 cottahs 6 chittaks of land out of plot Nos. 2480, 2477, 2486 and 2490 from the father of the defendants by a registered kobala dated 24-9-1917 stipulating therein that the vendee would take water from the pond in Plot No. 2491 belonging to the defendant for the purpose of cultivation of plot No. 2489. The 'ka' schedule land which is a part 2490 plot is used as a passage for ingress and egress in plot No. 2489. the plaintiffs have been enjoying this right of taking water from plot No. 2491 as a right of easement for more than 20 years but the said right of easement in respect of plot No. 2491 has not been recorded in the R. S. record of right. Taking advantage of thisentry the defendants have been creating obstruction on the passage measuring 330 sq. links described in schedule'ka' of the plaint. The plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 67 of 1970 for r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top