PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
KALYAN BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
KAMARHATI MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
( 1 ) IN the present writ petition it has been submitted by the petitioner that the respondent Kamarhati Municipality placed after on the writ petitioner for printing daily collection challans. Such order we placed by issuing an indent which is annexure 'd' to the writ petition. According to the petitioner in spite of supply of the printing materials t6 the Municipality no payment has been released and the municipal authority by a notification dated 19th July, 1996, being annexure 'j' to the writ petition came to the conclusion that the petitioner tried to deceive the municipality creating a financial trap and for the said reason the enlistment of the petitioner as a supplier of the municipality was also cancelled. All the purchase/supply orders already issued to the petitioner but not being carried out were also treated as cancelled. Kamarhati Municipality also black listed the petitioner as an enlisted contractor/supplier of the Municipality.
( 2 ) ON behalf of the Municipality, Mr. Swapan Kumar. We, filed affidavit-in-opposition, wherein it has been admitted that the writ petitioner on 29th March. 1996 supplied 25485 pieces printed form in loose sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.