SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 752

MALAY KUMAR BASU
SUBHAS ROY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.SAHA, KAZI SAFIULLA

M. K. BASU, J.

( 1 ) THE matter is taken up for passing order on the bail petition filed by the petitioner. It has been argued on his behalf that the offence under section 20 NDPS Act, 1985 should be treated as bailable in view of the recent amendment of the said Act (Act No. 9 of 2001) whereunder the expression 'small quantity' has been redefined. According to Mr. Mukherjee the quantity of ganja seized in this case being only one kilogram will fall within the category of 'small quantity' rendering the offence punishable with imprisonment for one year only. His further contention is that in view of the provisions of section 41 of the amended NDPS Act the lesser punishment which has been prescribed under the amended section 20 of the Act should be awardable in respect of all pending matters including bail-petitions and in that view of the matter under the provisions of the second schedule of the Criminal Procedure Code the offence should be treated as a bailable one, the maximum punishment that can be awarded for such an offence being only one year. Mr. Mukherjee further attracts our attention to the provisions of section 40 of the said Act also read with its section 2 and argues t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top