SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 386

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
UNIVERSAL PAPER MILLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Respondent


PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSH, J.

( 1 ) THE Court : This is an application challenging the demand notices issued by the respondent authorities calling upon the petitioner No. 1 and its Director to make payment of a sum of Rs, 65,56,417/- on account of employer's contribution under the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and threatening to proceed against them under the provisions of section 8b to 8g of the said Act and further the thereat of attachment in respect of bank account of the petitioner No. 1.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has challenged the said notice inter alia on the ground that the petitioner No. 1 is a sick company within the meaning of section 3 (1) (o) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as SICA Act) and further according to the petitioner, under section 2 (1) of the said SICA Act,1985 when an inquiry under section 17 is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned scheme is under implementation or where an appeal under section 25 relating to an industrial company is pending, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956 or any oth





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top