ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LTD – Appellant
Versus
OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE case of the plaintiff in this admiralty suit is based on a claim for damages. The case is that the ship M. V. Lima-I carried the Cargo belonging to the plaintiff and she reached the sandheads on 1-4-2001 and was berthed on 9-4-2001. Thereafter, on or about 14-4-2001 at the Haldia Port the discharge of cargo commenced and was continued on diverse dates. Ultimately, the discharge of cargo was completed on 27-4-2001.
( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the entirequantity of cargo was discharged and taken delivery of by the plaintiff.
( 3 ) THE cargo in this case is a kind of fertilizer and its effective use demands that its moisture content must remain very low and within a specified level. According to the plaintiff, such moisture content cannot exceed 0. 5%.
( 4 ) BUT in the plaintiff's cargo, which she carried, at the time of discharge, the moisture content exceeded more than the prescribed limits.
( 5 ) IN order to make out this case, the plaintiff mainly relied on three survey reports and some other documents and contended that as a result of this excessive moisture content, the cargo cannot be put to any use and the plaintiff's property in the cargo h
Videsh Sanchar Nigam v. M. V. Kapitan Kud
M. V. Elisabeth v. Harwan Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Jayanti Shipping Co. v. Food Corporation of India
E and B Steamship Co. Ltd. v. Sha Misrimal
Textiles and Yaru (P) Ltd. v. T. N. Steamship Co.
Alexanders Dryson S.A. v. Owners and Parties interested in Vessel M. V. Prapti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.