SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 168

A.K.MATHUR, GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA
JYOTI PRIYA MALLICK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANANT KUMAR SHAW, ARUNAVA GHOSH, HARIDAS, M.C.Das, NARANARAYAN GUPTA, Tapan Dutta Gupta, TARUN ROY

ASHOK KUMR MATHUR, C. J.

( 1 ) BY this public interest litigation the petitioner has prayed that the respondent Nos. 1 to 10 be directed to act in accordance with law and in accordance with Section 23 of the Police Act identifying the miscreants who resorted to wide spread violence on 2nd July, 2000 at Bidhan Nagar, Saltlake, by identifying them from the news reports and picture from the television reports, arresting them and bringing them to book. It is also prayed that the respondents Nos. 1 and 10 be commanded by a writ in the nature of Mandamus not to give any election duty in future to the respondents Nos. 3 to 9.

( 2 ) THE brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this public interest litigation are that 25th June, 2000 was the date fixed for municipal election for the Bidhan Nagar Municipality and the respondents Nos. 3 to 9 were deputed to see that the civic poll in Saltlake is held peacefully. On the day of of the poll severe violence took place all around Saltlake and the respondent authorities have failed to maintain peace and law and order in the area. It is alleged that it will be evident from the newspaper reports and from the television news. It is alleged th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top