High Court Of Calcutta
A. K. MATHUR, GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA
JYOTI PRIYA MALLICK - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
W. P. 10890 Of 2000
Decided On : 03/23/2001
POLICE ACT, 1861 - SECTION 23 - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC PEACE - DUTY OF POLICE - INVESTIGATION OF OFFENCES - ARREST OF OFFENDERS - ELECTION DUTY - ROLE OF DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND S. P. - IMPARTIALITY AND HONESTY IN CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS - POWER OF ELECTION COMMISSION.
Fact of the Case:
A public interest litigation was filed alleging that the police failed to maintain law and order during a repoll in Bidhan Nagar Municipality, resulting in violence and preventing genuine voters from exercising their franchise. The petitioner sought directions to the police to identify and apprehend the miscreants and to refrain from assigning election duty to the erring police officers in the future.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the police had failed to take effective action to prevent the violence and apprehend the miscreants, despite registering a case against 300 unknown persons. The court held that the police had a duty under Section 23 of the Police Act to maintain public peace, prevent the commission of offences, and apprehend offenders.
Issues: 1. Whether the police had failed to discharge their duties in maintaining law and order during the repoll in Bidhan Nagar Municipality? 2. Whether the police should be directed to identify and apprehend the miscreants involved in the violence? 3. Whether the erring police officers should be barred from being assigned election duty in the future?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the police had failed to discharge their duties under Section 23 of the Police Act by not taking effective action to prevent the violence and apprehend the miscreants. 2. The court directed the police to properly investigate the case registered against the unknown persons and bring the miscreants to book. 3. The court declined to issue a direction barring the erring police officers from being assigned election duty in the future, as this was a matter within the domain of the Election Commission.
Final Decision: The court directed the police to complete the investigation of the case and bring the miscreants to book as expeditiously as possible.
( 1 ) BY this public interest litigation the petitioner has prayed that the respondent Nos. 1 to 10 be directed to act in accordance with law and in accordance with Section 23 of the Police Act identifying the miscreants who resorted to wide spread violence on 2nd July, 2000 at Bidhan Nagar, Saltlake, by identifying them from the news reports and picture from the television reports, arresting them and bringing them to book. It is also prayed that the respondents Nos. 1 and 10 be commanded by a writ in the nature of Mandamus not to give any election duty in future to the respondents Nos. 3 to 9.
( 2 ) THE brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this public interest litigation are that 25th June, 2000 was the date fixed for municipal election for the Bidhan Nagar Municipality and the respondents Nos. 3 to 9 were deputed to see that the civic poll in Saltlake is held peacefully. On the day of of the poll severe violence took place all around Saltlake and the respondent authorities have failed to maintain peace and law and order in the area. It is alleged that it will be evident from the newspaper reports and from the television news. It is alleged that in Ward No. 16 of Bidhan Nagar Municipality the electronic voting machine (EVM) at booth No. 3a became inoperative after polling was completed as a result of which the ultimate decision of the electorate of that booth could not be ascertained. The State Election Commission thereafter ordered for repoll which was held on 2nd July, 2000. From the late night of 1st July, 2000 about 1000 miscreants were brought to Saltlake who started throwing bombs in the late night of 1st July, 2000 and in the early morning of 2nd July, 2000. Bombing was resorted to scare away the voters which continued up till 2. 00 a. m. , of 2nd July, 2000. It is alleged that 2nd July, 2000 was a Sunday and polling in Booth No. 3a of Ward No. 16 of Bidhan Nagar Municipality commenced at around 7. 00 a. m. in the morning and was concluded at 3 p. m. in the evening. At around 11. 30 a. m. severe bombing started and some of the miscreants even went to the extent of beating up Sri Tapan Sikdar, the Hon'ble Minister of State for Tele Communication, Sri Ranjit Panja, Sri Sudip Bandopadhyay, Sri Bikram Sarkar andsri Ananda Mohan Biswas, all Members of the Loksabha and Sri Jayanta Bhattacharjee, Member of Rajya Sabha. It is alleged that others who were beaten were Sri Subrata Mukherjee, Sri Sobhandeb Chatterjee, Sri Gopal Mukherjee and Sri Sanjay Bakshi, all MLAs. Several gun shots were fired in the air. It is alleged that all these took place in front of respondents Nos. 2 to 9 that is the DGP, SP,. Sub-Divisional Magistrate and District Magistrate of the area and other officers, but they failed to check the violence. As a result of these the genuine voters were prevented from going to the poll booth and exercise their franchise. It is alleged that the respondents Nos. 2 to 8 failed to discharge their duties dispite the fact that the incident has taken place, no effective measures were taken to check this violence and nor any follow up action was taken by the police. Therefore, by this petition it is prayed that these respondents have failed to discharge their duties, therefore, they should not be assigned any election duty in the forthcoming election. It is also prayed that the respondents Nos. 2 to 9 should be directed to take effective steps in accordance with Section 23 of the Police Act and apprehend those miscreants and culprits who resorted to this kind of violence.
( 3 ) AN affidavit in opposition was filed by the respondents Nos. 1 to 9 which was affirmed by the respondent No. 9, the District Magistrate and a preliminary objection was taken that the present public interest litigation is not a bona fide one and it is motivated by other considerations than that of the public spirited one and there is remedy provided under Section 76 of the West Bengal Municipal Election Act, 199
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.