D.K.SETH
SALIM MAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
N. K. PANSARI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner have filed C. S. No. 108 of 2001 as plaintiff against N. K. Pansari and others for certain reliefs. The plaint case inter alia, was that the plaintiff is the lessee of premises No. 25, Black Burn Lane, Calcutta for a period of 99 years through a registered deed of lease dated 5th December, 1984 obtained from Miss. Lily Tweena and Mrs. Rosalind Jacob who were possessing the said premises adversely and as of right for more than 12 years. Having returned from Dubai on 9th February, 2001 he found construction being carried on in the said premises. On enquiry he came to learn that the defendant No. 1, N,. K. Pansari had been making construction. In connection with the said suit an affidavit-in-opposition was filed on behalf of the defendant No. 1 wherein the defendant No. 1 had disclosed the fact that such construction is being made on the basis of a plan sanctioned sometimes back since been revalidated in 1997. Since the relief with regard to the revalidation of the said plan could not be had in the suit and that the Corporation was not a party to it, therefore, the writ petition has since been filed in which an interim order is obtained from this Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.