High Court Of Calcutta
Amitava Lala
KANHAIYA EXPORTS - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS - Respondent
W. P. 825 Of 2000
Decided On : 05/24/2001
{'KEYWORD': 'DEPB LICENCES', 'SUBJECT': "Customs Authority's Refusal to Return DEPB Licences Beyond Prescribed Verification Period", 'ACT SECTION LIST': ['Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992', 'Customs Act, 1962']}
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner exported goods under DEPB scheme and obtained DEPB Licences. Customs Authority withheld the licences beyond the prescribed verification period claiming enquiry into Present Market Value (PMV) of the goods.
Finding of the Court:
Customs Authority cannot hold up licences indefinitely on apprehension of fraud. Circulars prescribing verification procedure must be followed. Authority's satisfaction for enquiry beyond prescribed period requires specific conditions to be met.
Issues: 1. Whether Customs Authority can withhold DEPB Licences beyond the prescribed verification period? 2. Whether the impugned circular amending the verification procedure is valid?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Customs Authority's power to verify DEPB Licences is limited by the prescribed procedure and time frame. Indefinite withholding of licences violates Article 19 (1) (g) and 301 of the Constitution of India. 2. The impugned circular amending the verification procedure cannot override the statutory provisions of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.
Final Decision: Writ petition allowed. Customs Authority directed to release the DEPB Licences and bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner.
( 1 ) THIS writ petition is made by the petitioner company and one of its Directors by saying that the Circular bearing No. 23/99 dated 11th May, 1999 or Paragraph 4 of the said Circular being annexure "dd" to the petition be quashed and/or set aside. It is also prayed thereunder that DEPB (Duty Exemption Pass Book) Licences being No. 0210005970/3/06/00 being annexure 'c' to the petition be returned to the petitioner and to allow benefit of the scheme to the petitioner or its transferees. The similar benefit of DEPB Licences also claimed in respect of Nos. 121000490/3/06/00, 0210005508/3/06/00, 0210005514, 1210005642/3/06/00 being annexure 'f collectively to the petition.
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner company on 30th June, 1999 they have exported certain goods known as "steel Welding Electrodes". Consignments were provisionally assessed and "let export" orders were passed. The exports of consignments were made under Duty Exemption Pass Book (DEPB) scheme under which the petitioners are entitled to duty credit of 18 per cent of the Free on Board (FOB) value of export specially to the limitation of 50 per cent of the Present Market Value (PMV) of the goods in question. The export of the goods is made under AR 4 form issued by the Excise Authorities under Customs Notification No. 69/97. The petitioner declared FOB price of US Dollar $ 953694 and PMV at Rs. 4,40,70,280/ -. After making the enquiry, on 4th August, 1999 Shipping Bills were finally accepted by the Customs Authority on the basis of declared PMV. The petitioners obtained copies of Shipping Bills and applied to the Licencing Authority i. e. Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) under Ministry of Commerce and on 10th September, 1999, Licencing Authority issued DEPB Licences.
( 3 ) ON 30th November, 1999 the Customs Authority issued a Circular for verification of DEPB in view of the few instances of forged DEPB which came into circulation. Under the circular DEPB was required to be submitted for verification for the purpose of ascertaining the authenticity/genuineness of the Shipping documents and DEPB only. Under the circular within 48 hours after verification, DEPB licences were required to be returned to the presenter. The petitioner filed the DEPB licences to the Customs Authority for the limited purpose of verification in terms of the Circular No. 14 of 1999-Cus. , dated 15th March, 1999. The Customs Authorities accepted the same but did not return the petitioner after verification without showing any ground and finally on 18th March, 2000 the respondent refused to return the DEPB on the ground of Circular No. 23/99-Cus. , dated 11th May, 1999 alleging the Commissioner of Customs has decided to cause enquiry and proceeded to deny the benefit of Duty Free Import against the DEPB.
( 4 ) ALTHOUGH several prayers were made the petitioners basically challenged the arbitrary refusal of Customs authority in releasing the DEPB licences beyond the period fixed under Circular mentioned hereunder.
( 5 ) IT appears that the DEPB licences now issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 by another authority which comes under the Ministry of Commerce. The licences have statutory force as those are issued under the provision of the Act. Section 2 (g) of the Act says 'licence' means a licence to import or export and includes a customs clearance permit and any other permission issued or granted under the Act. Nature and Character of licence is depending upon the policy of the Central Government. Policy making power of the Central Government is given under Section 3 of the Act. Sub-section (1) of Section 3 speaks the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make provision for the development and regulation of foreign trade by facilitating imports and increasing exports. Formulation of export and import policy is also provided for Central Government under Section 5 of the Act. Central Government is empower
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.