SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 705

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
HUKUM RAJ SAJJAN RAJ KUMBAT – Appellant
Versus
El DORADO GUARANTEE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SARKAR, ANIRUDHA BOSE, RANJAN BACHAWAT

A. K. GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) IN this matter an application was filed under section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter called ACA 96] by the petitioner praying for interim protection in connection with the proposed artitration proceeding over the dispute between the parties.

( 2 ) THE material facts which appear from pleadings between the parties are as follows : the petitioner during the period between 19th April 2000 and 30th April 2001 placed various orders for sale and purchase of different shares with the respondent which is a company carrying on business, inter alia, as a sharebroker. The case of the petitioner is that as a result of such transaction, an amount of Rs. 1,74,54,140. 10p. became due and payable to the petitioner. It is the further case of the petitioner that the respondent received all the sums in respect of such transaction carried on by it for and on behalf of the petitioner with various stock exchanges only as a broker and trustee of the petitioner and the respondents are obliged to pay it back to the petitioner after deducting the brokerage.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner is that by a letter dated 15th May, 2001, the respondent acknowled






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top