SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 668

PRATAP KUMAR RAY
G. MALLICKA – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHNA RAO, P.S.BISWAS, T.MUKHERJEE

P. K. RAY, J.

( 1 ) IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the office order No. 2956 dated December, 14, 1998 issued by the Secretary, Municipal Council, Port Blair whereby and whereunder the petitioner was appointed as Workcharged Mazdoor in the pay scale of Rs. 2550-3200/- with basic pay of Rs. 2550/-under certain terms and conditions with immediate effect. The petitioner's grievance against that order is namely on the point that in terms of the earlier order dated September 18, 1998 passed in WP. 63 of 1995 by Shyamal Kumar Sen, J (as His Lordship then was) her case was not considered for absorption in the post of Lower Grade Clerk (hereinafter referred to as Clerk for brevity ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner's further grievance is relating to non reservation of 1% for the post of clerks by the Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as the council for brevity) in terms of the reservation rule as applicable under The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1995 for brevity ).

( 3 ) THIS writ application has been oppose










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top