SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 596

SAMARESH BANERJEE, GORACHAND DE
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT YADAV ALIAS B. P. YADAV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Das, KRISHANA BANIK

G. C. DE, J.

( 1 ) NEW India Assurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the insurer') filed this appeal under section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 challenging the judgment and order dated 09. 7. 1996 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, West Bengal, Second Court in Claim Case No. 177 of 1994.

( 2 ) THE appellant respondent No. 1, Bharat Yadav filed the claim case claiming a compensation of Rs. 1,11,355/- alleging that in course of his employment on 5. 4. 1993 as a khalasi, in Vehicle No. DL-IG-A-0033 belonging to the respondent No, 2 Kuljit Singh, he sustained injuries on both legs including thigh, knee, ankle, foot and toes, wrist and back as a bulk of plywood that were being carried by the said vehicle (Truck), fell on him. Initially, he was treated at Medical College and Hospital, Calcutta for 18 days and subsequently in a Howrah Hospital for about 9 months. As a result of the accident, he was not in a position to move without the help of a pair of crutch. The claimant was examined by a doctor who issued a certificate to the effect that the claimant sustained permanent total disablement of hundred percent. At the relevant time the claima

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top